Comments on: ArangoDB vs. CouchDB Benchmarking | ArangoDB 2012 https://arangodb.com/2012/08/benchmarking-arangodb-and-couchdb-performance-arangodb/ The database for graph and beyond Wed, 03 Apr 2024 04:38:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Frank Celler https://arangodb.com/2012/08/benchmarking-arangodb-and-couchdb-performance-arangodb/#comment-1081 Sun, 26 Aug 2012 10:13:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=1030#comment-1081 In reply to jsteemann.

 Maybe one could use a simple pseudo-random number generator like “x * 13 + 5”?

]]>
By: jsteemann https://arangodb.com/2012/08/benchmarking-arangodb-and-couchdb-performance-arangodb/#comment-1080 Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:57:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=1030#comment-1080 In reply to Timo.

There’s so many things that could be tested, but unfortunately not so much time to do it.

But yes, doing a cross-action benchmark would be nice and hopefully we’ll find the time to do it at some later point. If so, I’d suggest not using random entries because it would introduce some non-deterministic behavior (which might or might not matter for the results).

]]>
By: Timo https://arangodb.com/2012/08/benchmarking-arangodb-and-couchdb-performance-arangodb/#comment-1079 Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:27:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=1030#comment-1079 I miss a cross action Benchmark, get, insert, update and delete at the same time.
Just one action at a moment is not a good test case, it should something like: I G I U G I D in a 100.000 loop. The Update and delete should target different random entries and not the last inserted.

]]>