Comments on: Multi-Model Benchmark: Assessing ArangoDB’s Versatility https://arangodb.com/2015/06/multi-model-benchmark/ The database for graph and beyond Thu, 27 Jun 2024 07:37:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: fceller https://arangodb.com/2015/06/multi-model-benchmark/#comment-501 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:56:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=7814#comment-501 In reply to Patrick Cauley.

We wanted to test the code in a real live environment. We did tests with the console. It only makes a difference for the single reads & writes, for longer running queries like shortest path, aggregation, neighbors there is no difference. But with single reads & writes, you really want to know how well you application plays with the database.

]]> By: Patrick Cauley https://arangodb.com/2015/06/multi-model-benchmark/#comment-500 Tue, 30 Jun 2015 03:38:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=7814#comment-500 If the issue is the node driver why not run comparisons from each databases console?

]]> By: Rasmus Schultz https://arangodb.com/2015/06/multi-model-benchmark/#comment-499 Sun, 07 Jun 2015 08:28:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=7814#comment-499 I’d like to challenge you to include OrientDB in that comparison – it uses a similar multi model, is ACID compliant, scales horizontally and vertically in a similar way, has SQL-like language and supports joins, so it is very close to ArangoDB in terms of features, but in addition supports schema, which is something I miss in ArangoDB. It also has fairly poor driver support on every platform except Java, which is the main reason I’m still interested in ArangoDB.

]]>