Comments on: Is UNQL Dead? Future of NoSQL Query Languages | ArangoDB Blog 2012 https://arangodb.com/2012/04/is-unql-dead/ The database for graph and beyond Wed, 10 Jul 2024 06:10:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: jsteemann https://arangodb.com/2012/04/is-unql-dead/#comment-1116 Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:35:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=326#comment-1116 In reply to wcandillon.

At a first glance, jsoniq looks very nice.
For simple access patterns (by primary key) it may be still overkill,
however, NoSQL vendors could still keep APIs for such queries where
query parsing & planning overhead is undesired.

But anyway, having a “standard” query language at least for JSON document databases would be help as users wouldn’t need to learn a new language/concept for each database.

I hope jsoniq will get more adoption than UNQL got.

]]>
By: Frank Celler https://arangodb.com/2012/04/is-unql-dead/#comment-1115 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:35:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=326#comment-1115 In reply to wcandillon.

 Yes, indeed. I like the direction in which this is going. A much more “programmatic” approach. I think this is easier to understand when dealing with lists and arrays. Jan has developed AQL in a very similar direction: https://www.arangodb.com/2012/06/20/querying-a-nosql-database-the-elegant-way

]]>
By: wcandillon https://arangodb.com/2012/04/is-unql-dead/#comment-1114 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:09:00 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=326#comment-1114 Since this summer, their is a new proposal on the table for being the SQL of NoSQL: http://jsoniq.org.

]]>
By: The Data Day, Today: Apr 19 2012 — Too much information https://arangodb.com/2012/04/is-unql-dead/#comment-1113 Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:28:51 +0000 http://www.arangodb.com/?p=326#comment-1113 […] * Is UNQL Dead? […]

]]>